Each minor obstacle makes only small changes in how you think, and if you "notice" these at all, they merely appear as transient feelings or as fleeting ideas. But, when more serious obstacles persist and keep you from making progress, then various Critics intervene to make larger changes in how you think.
if your thoughts were controlled in only a single way, you would be in danger of becoming a monomaniac.
アフリカやブラジルの初めて見る作家はもちろん、見慣れた日本の作家にも発見があった。特に、奈良美智の壺(？)。この人、こんなにすごかったんだ。何百年後かにこの壺が発掘されたら、きっと未来の人々は感嘆の声をあげるだろう。
8月31日まで。
What could have made us all victims of that "amnesia of infancy"? I don't think this is simply because we "forgot". Instead, I suspect that it results from our developing new and better ways to represent both physical and mental events - and some of these methods became so effective that they replaced our previous ones.
trying to make education too pleasant might hinder children from learning to climb the conceptual mountains inside their monds.
you can usually start to improve a skill by experimenting with many small steps - but eventually no more such changes may help, because you have reached a local peak. Then further improvement may require you to endure some discomfort and discouragement.
In such cases, "I am enjoying this," could mean, "I want to remain in my present state, so I'll try to suppress whatever might change it."
This often enables us to use our knowledge about one kind of thing to understand some other, different kind of thing - and discovering new ways to look at things is one of our most powerful commonsense processes.
Then how similar they may seem to be will depend upon which differences one decides to ignore. But the importance of each difference depends upon one's current intentions and goals.
Douglas Lenar 1997: "Analogy works because there is a lot of common causality in the world, common causes which lead to an overlap between two systems, between two phenomena or whatever.
In other words, "free will" is not a process we use to make a decision, but one that we use to stop other processes!
perhaps we use those tidy structures of notes and tunes as simplified "virtual" worlds for refining Difference-Detectors that we can then use for condensing more complex events (in other realms) into more orderly storylike scripts.
Also, when repetitive signals anesthetize some parts of your brain, this could relaeas some othe resources to think in new, unusual ways. This could be why some types of meditation can thrive on repetitive mantras and chants.
Finally, our "Storytellers" interpret each piece as similar to events in other realms -such as depicting a journey through space and time, or a skirmish among personalities. One special appeal of music is how effectively it can depict what we might call "abstract emotional scripts" -stories that seem to be about entities about whom we know nothing at all except that we can recognize their individual characteristics -e.g., this one is warm and affectionate, whereas that one is cold and intensive.
http://www.bishoku.no.ousama.co.jp/ousama/?page_id=35
鱧なら＜千ひろ＞の鱧のお造り、貝なら＜エディション・コウジ シモムラ＞の「海水で軽く火を通した牡蠣の冷製 海水と柑橘のジュレ 岩海苔風味」という記載スタイル。
そばは＜慈久庵＞（茨城・常陸太田）の鴨なん、オムライスは＜ルー・ド・メール＞の「特製 ビーフ・オムライス（しょうゆ味）」、とのこと。 こちらなら、それ一品だけでも頼めるかな。
http://ami-search.amivoice.com/toride/usr/search.exe?process=disp_right&v...
取手二中で行われた「柿の木プロジェクト」が道徳の教科書に取り上げられることについての質疑。（平成20年第3回定例会）
In the case of most music, this structure is clear: we begin by grouping separate notes into "measures" of equal length, and we then group these into larger section, until the whole composition is seen as a storylike structure. We do this in vision and language, too - although with less repetitiousness - by grouping collections of smaller events into multiple levels of events, incidents, episodes, sections, and plots. However, we see this most clearly in music forms.
In the case of most music, this structure is clear: we begin by grouping separate notes into "measures" of equal length, and we then group these into larger section, until the whole composition is seen as a storylike structure. We do this in vision and language, too - although with less repetitiousness - by grouping collections of smaller events into multiple levels of events, incidents, episodes, sections, and plots. However, we see this most clearly in music forms.
"An expert is one who does not have to think. He knows." -Frank Lloyd Wright
I suspect that ,inside each human brain, many such processes all run at once, at various levels in various realms. These range from reactive systems that work all the time (like those that maintain our temperatures) up to the self-conscious levels at which we less frequently think about what kind of person we'd like to be.
